Abstract
This paper discusses the resources for deconstruction offered by cognitive science, drawing inspiration from David Gunkel’s work on the topic (Deconstruction, MIT Press 2021). The gesture of deconstruction is seen as having a positive impact on the development of this interdisciplinary field by challenging misleading dichotomies and examining its underlying assumptions, such as the symmetry of integration.
-------------------------
Received: 6/11/2022. Reviewed: 13/12/2022. Accepted: 20/12/2022.
Publisher
Uniwersytet Kardynala Stefana Wyszynskiego
Reference21 articles.
1. Abrahamsen, A.A. (1987). Bridging boundaries versus breaking boundaries: Psycholinguistics in perspective. Synthese, 3(72), 355-388.
2. Ballantyne, N. (2019). Epistemic trespassing. Mind, 128(510). DOI10.1093/mind/fzx042.
3. Barsalou, L.W. (2010). Introduction to 30th anniversary perspectives on cognitive science: Past, present, and future. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(3), 322-327. DOI10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01104.x.
4. Bermúdez, J.L. (2014). Cognitive science: An introduction to the science of the mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Boden, M.A. (1999). What is interdisciplinarity?. In: R. Cunningham (ed.), Interdisciplinarity and the organization of knowledge in Europe, 13-24. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Around "Deconstruction." Author’s Response;Studia Philosophiae Christianae;2023-12-31