Recommendations for Improving the Use of Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing Databases in Law Enforcement Investigations

Author:

Cook Anisha1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Johns Hopkins University, Center for Biotechnology Education, Baltimore, MD Institution 2: Savannah State University, Department of Chemistry and Forensic Science

Abstract

Prisoners are some of the most vulnerable populations in our society today, often relinquishing to the state everything from medical autonomy to family support. In a system where wrongful convictions are not unheard of, it is critical that we preserve the civil rights of investigative subjects wherever possible. Law enforcement agencies in the United States have increasingly begun using direct-to-consumer recreational genetic databases as a tool to enable forensic investigations. These commercial genetic testing companies analyze polymorphisms in DNA to isolate genealogical information, medical data, and other traits. Traditionally, law enforcement has been restricted to the use of matching repeating sequences in non-coding sections of DNA. However, through services like GEDMatch, law enforcement has gained access to single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers from upwards of 25 million consumers throughout the world. This rapidly developing technology must be regulated to ensure that consumers, as well as blood relatives of consumers, are not unfairly targeted by investigations. With studies indicating that DNA is typically reported as the single most important piece of evidence to jurors, it is in the best interests of policymakers to ensure that the DNA data is both accurate and used fairly. First, we will provide a background of the technology and regulation of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing databases in law enforcement. Second, we propose a mechanism by which states might legislate the appropriate use of these databases by law enforcement by limiting access and enforcing a double-blind system. This paper lays out the background and policy proposal for a requirement of direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies to communicate the possibility and type of information shared with law enforcement, and a framework by which policymakers can ensure unbiased and minimally intrusive use by law enforcement.

Publisher

Journal of Science Policy and Governance, Inc.

Reference19 articles.

1. Brown T. R. 2019. “Why We Fear Genetic Informants: Using Genetic Genealogy to Catch Serial Killers.” The Columbia science and technology law review, 21(1), 114–181. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7946161/

2. California v. Greenwood, et al. 1988. 486 U.S. 35. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/486/35

3. Covolo, L., S. Rubinelli, E. Ceretti, and G. Umberto. 2015. “Internet-based direct-to-consumer genetic testing: A systematic review.” Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(12). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4378

4. de Groot NF, B. C. van Beers, and G. Meynen. 2021. Commercial DNA tests and police investigations: a broad bioethical perspective. Journal of Medical Ethics 47(12). https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2021-107568

5. Department of Justice. 2023. “Collecting DNA evidence at property crime scenes: Profile types.” https://nij.ojp.gov/nij-hosted-online-training-courses/codis/collecting-dna-evidence-at-property-crime-scenes/profile-types

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3