Affiliation:
1. School of Fundamental Biology and Biotechnology, Siberian Federal University ; Biophysics Institute of the Siberian Branch of the RAS – Division of Federal Research Center «Krasnoyarsk Scientific Center of the Siberian Branch of the RAS»
2. Biophysics Institute of the Siberian Branch of the RAS – Division of Federal Research Center «Krasnoyarsk Scientific Center of the Siberian Branch of the RAS»
Abstract
The approach used by physics is based on the identification and study of ideal objects, which is also the basis of biophysics, in combination with von Neumann heuristic modeling and functional fractionation according to R.Rosen is discussed as a tool for studying the properties of consciousness. The object of the study is a kind of line of analog systems: the human brain, the vertebrate brain, the invertebrate brain and artificial neural networks capable of reflection, which is a key property characteristic of consciousness. Reflection in the broad sense of the word, understood as an internal representation of the external world, is characteristic of a wide range of animals, and some of them (bumblebees, fish) even demonstrate reflection in the narrow sense of the word, understood as an inner self-representation. This complex behavior is realized by miniature brains of ~1 million neurons. The use of simple recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to obtain answers to general questions is illustrated. For example, it has been shown a small RNS is able to pass delayed matching to sample (DMTS) test, forming an individual dynamic representation of the received stimulus, allowing decoding by a special external neural detector. . It has been demonstrated in the reflexive game “even-odd”, the RNS has a huge advantage over a multi-layered neural network, with the same and a larger number of neurons – reflection defeats regression. It was found that the asymmetry of outcomes in the odd-even game, which was explained by various causes, including psychological ones – “it’s easier to catch up than to run away”, is reproduced in the game of two RNNs. Obviously, there are no psychological causes here and the advantage of the player playing for “even” is explained by the more complex strategy of the “odd” player – he needs to predict the opponent’s move and choose the opposite one.
Publisher
Pyatigorsk State University
Reference42 articles.
1. Seth A. K., Bayne T. Theories of consciousness // Nature Reviews Neuroscience. – 2022. – Vol. 23. – № 7. – P. 439-452.
2. Vasil'ev V. V. Trudnaya problema soznaniya. – M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2009. – 272 s. (Vasil’ev V. V. Hard problem of consciousness. – M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2009. – 272 p.)
3. Revonsuo A. Psikhologiya soznaniya. – SPb.: Piter, 2013. – 309 s. (Revonsuo A. Psychology of consciousness. – SPb.: Piter, 2013. – 309 p.)
4. Chalmers D. Soznayushchii um. V poiskakh fundamental'noi teorii. – M.: URSS: Knizhnyi dom «LIBROKOM», 2003. – 512 s. (Chalmers D. Conscious mind. In search of a fundamental theory. – M.: URSS: Knizhniy dom «LIBROKOM», 2003. – 512 p.)
5. Penrouz R. Teni razuma: v poiskakh nauki o soznanii. –M.-Izhevsk:Institut kosmicheskikh issledovanii, 2005. – 688 s. (Penrose R. Shadows of the Mind: In Search of a Science of Consciousness // R. Penrose. – M.- Izhevsk: Institut kosmicheskih issledovanij, 2005. – 688 p.)