The use of lidocaine infusion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Awan Bakhtawar1,Elsaigh Mohamed1,Elkomos Beshoy Effat1,Sohail Azka1,Asqalan Ahmad2,Baqar Safa Owhida Mousa3,Elgendy Noha Ahmed4,Saleh Omnia S.5,Szul Justyna Malgorzata1,Juan Anna San1,Alasmar Mohamed6,Marzouk Mohamed Mustafa17

Affiliation:

1. Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK

3. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Derriford Hospital, University Hospital Plymouth, Plymouth, UK

4. Department of Acute and Emergency Medicine, Frimley Park Hospital, Frimley, UK

5. Division of General and GI Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

6. Laboratory for Surgical and Metabolic Research, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

7. Department of General Surgery, Ain Shams University Hospital, Cairo, Egypt

Abstract

Abstract Being one of the most common abdominal surgical procedures, numerous techniques have been adapted to decrease post-operative pain post cholecystectomy. However, the efficacy of intravenous (IV) lidocaine in managing post operative pain after LC is still controversial, according to many recent studies. This study aims to detect the effectiveness of IV lidocaine compared to other medications in managing post-operative pain. PubMed, Scopes, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies from inception to June 2023, and a systematic review and meta-analysis was done. According to eligibility criteria, 14 studies (898 patients) were included in our study. The pooled results of the included studies showed that the pain score after 6, 12 and 24 h after the surgery was significantly lower in those who received IV lidocaine as a painkiller (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] 6H, mean difference [MD] = −1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −2.20, −0.20, P = 0.02; I 2 = 98%, VAS 12H, MD = −0.90, 95% CI = −1.52, −0.29, P = 0.004; I 2 = 96% and VAS 24H, MD = −0.86, 95% CI = −1.48, −0.24, P = 0.007; I 2 = 92%). In addition, IV lidocaine is associated with a significant decrease in the opioid requirement after the surgery (opioid requirements, MD = −29.53, 95% CI = −55.41, −3.66, P = 0.03; I 2 = 98%). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of nausea and vomiting after the surgery between the two groups (nausea and vomiting, relative risk = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.57, 1.45, P = 0.69; I 2 = 50%). Lidocaine infusion in LC is associated with a significant decrease in post operative pain and in opioid requirements after the surgery.

Publisher

Medknow

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3