Fracture resistance of ultrathin occlusal veneer fabricated by different CAD/CAM materials

Author:

El Zak Wafaa Talat1,Shakal Mahmoud A.-E.1,ElSharkawy Sherif M.1

Affiliation:

1. Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the fracture resistance of ultrathin occlusal veneer fabricated by different CAD/CAM materials. Methods The occlusal surface of 40 extracted lower premolars was prepared in the enamel layer and restored with occlusal veneers with fissures/cusp thickness of 0.5/1 ml made from two different dental CAD/CAM materials. Groups of the study included the following. Group I: lithium disilicate glass-ceramic n = 20; the group was further divided into two subgroups according to the thickness of each of them. Subgroup A: (n = 10) 0.5 mm and subgroup B: (n = 10) 1 mm. Group II: Cerasmart n = 20 is further divided into two subgroups according to the thickness of each of them. Subgroup A: (n = 10) 0.5mm, subgroup B: (n = 10) 1 mm. Occlusal veneers were etched with ceramic etch (Ips ceramic etching gel/ATZGEL-IVOCLAR AG) and then bonded using an adhesive luting system (G-MULTI PRIMER and G-CEMTM Veneer) light cure adhesive resin cement (G-CEHTM veneer). The prepared teeth were etched using phosphoric gel and bonded using Bisco All bond universal. All specimens were subjected to load till fracture; these loads were recorded and statistically analyzed using the one-way ANOVA. The mode of failure of the specimen was classified; the correlation between fracture strength and mode of failure was analyzed. Results In this study, fracture strengths (mean ± standard deviation) of cerasmart recorded were 0.5 mm (887.71 ± 284.79N), 1 mm (953.73 ± 214.06N), and for lithium disilicate 0.5 mm (455.16 ± 134.96N), 1 mm (768.59 ± 154.08N). Cerasmart had significantly higher fracture strength than lithium disilicate in 0.5 mm thickness, and significantly different fracture strength in 1 mm thickness. Most specimens (31 from 40) had been fractured in the restoration without involving the tooth structure. Conclusion The Cerasmart material could be considered a valid alternative to IPS e.max material.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,Water Science and Technology,Geography, Planning and Development

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3