Efficacy and safety of quick penetrating solution heparin, quick penetrating solution diclofenac, and heparin gel in the prevention of infusion-associated superficial thrombophlebitis: A randomized controlled trial

Author:

Bajpai Vijeta1,Patel Tejas K.2,Dwivedi Priyanka1,Kabi Ankita1,Singh Yashpal3,Agarwal Richa4,Gupta Ravi5,Kishore Surekha6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, Uttarakhand, India

2. Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, Uttarakhand, India

3. Department of Anaesthesiology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

4. Department of Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, Uttarakhand, India

5. Department of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, Uttarakhand, India

6. Department of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India

Abstract

Abstract Background: The present study aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of quick penetrating solution (QPS) heparin, QPS diclofenac, and heparin gel in the prevention of superficial thrombophlebitis (ST). Materials and Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted after approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee and registration to Clinical Trial Registry of India. Patients of 18–60 years age, American Society of Anesthesiologists I/II, and who needed venous cannulation for at least 72 h were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into three groups receiving study drugs (heparin gel, QPS heparin, and QPS diclofenac) every 8 hourly for a period of 72 h. Venous cannulation site was graded using the Visual Infusion Phlebitis Scale. Patients developing no ST, mean time to reach ST Grade 1 and 2, prevention of ST probability, and cost-effectiveness of interventions during the study period were assessed. Results: Out of 219 included patients, development of no ST in the study groups at 72 h of treatment were heparin gel (11%), QPS heparin (9.6%), and QPS diclofenac (2.7%). The mean time (hours) to develop any grade ST in the study arms was heparin gel (36.2 [11.9]), QPS heparin (40.0 [13.4]), and QPS diclofenac (37.0 [13.2]). The Kaplan–Meier analysis did not reveal significant differences for the prevention of any grade ST or severe ST in three treatment arms. The average cost-effectiveness ratio for preventing thrombophlebitis was 14.2 in heparin gel-, 13.2 in QPS heparin-, and 95.6 in QPS diclofenac-treated patients. Conclusion: Based on efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness, heparin gel or QPS heparin can be used to prevent ST due to intravenous cannulation in surgical patients. QPS diclofenac is not a cost-effective option to prevent ST.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference23 articles.

1. Nursing interventions and peripheral venous catheter related phlebitis- systemic literature review;Oliveria;Nursing,2010

2. Risk factors for infusion-related phlebitis with small peripheral venous catheters. A randomized controlled trial;Maki;Ann Intern Med,1991

3. Predisposing factors to phlebitis in patients with peripheral intravenous catheters:A descriptive study;Uslusoy;J Am Acad Nurse Pract,2008

4. Superficial thrombophlebitis:Epidemiology, physiopathology, diagnosis and treatment;Macrone;J Vasc Bras,2008

5. Infection control –A battle in vein:Infusion phlebitis;Jackson;Nurs Times,1998

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3