Preparing for Medical School Selection: Exploring the Complexity of Disadvantage through Applicant Narratives

Author:

Jackson Dawn1,Greenfield Sheila2,Parry Jayne2,Agwu Juliana Chizo1,Spruce Austen1,Seyan Gurdeep3,Whalley Nicole4

Affiliation:

1. College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Sutton Coldfield, UK

2. Public Health, Institute of Applied Health Research, Birmingham, Sutton Coldfield, UK

3. Ley Hill Surgery, Birmingham, Sutton Coldfield, UK

4. St Thomas Medical Group, Exeter, UK

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackground:Despite a growing drive to improve diversity in medical schools, those from state schools and less-advantaged sociodemographic backgrounds remain underrepresented. We explore applicants’ approaches to preparing for medical school selection, considering the complexity of sociodemographic disadvantage in this highly competitive process.Methods:Narrative interviews were undertaken with applicants to a United Kingdom medical school, exploring experiences of preparation for selection (n= 23). Participants were purposively sampled based on involvement in widening participation schemes, school background, gender, and ethnicity. Transcribed data were analyzed using Labov and Waletzky’s analytic framework. Bourdieu’s concepts of cultural capital and habitus provided a lens to constraints faced and variable experiences. This informed a consideration of the ways applicants approached and navigated their preparation, in the face of various constraints.Results:Constraints to resources and support were often apparent for those from state nonselective (SNS) schools. These applicants and those beginning their preparation later (12–18 months before application) appeared particularly vulnerable to myths and misunderstandings about the application process and appeared less confident and less discerning in their navigation of preparation. Some of the applicants, particularly those from independent and state selective schools, appeared confident and competent in navigating the complexities of the application process, while others (often from SNS schools) were more frequently lost or stressed by the process.Discussion:Those who lack particular preparatory tools or resources (materially, culturally, or perceptually) must “make do” as they prepare for medical school selection, In doing so, they may risk a haphazard, ill-informed or ill-equipped approach. Constraints to opportunities, more typically experienced by those from SNS schools, appeared to motivate the process of bricolage for a number of the applicants. Perversely, medical schools have introduced nonacademic requirements to level the playing field of disadvantage, yet applicants in this group appear to experience challenges as they prepare for selection.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

Education,General Medicine

Reference34 articles.

1. Impact of medical student origins on the likelihood of ultimately practicing in areas of low versus high socio-economic status;Puddey;BMC Med Educ,2017

2. Do Differentials in Access to Advice and Support at UK Schools on Preparation for the UK Clinical Aptitude Test Disadvantage some Candidate groups?;Lambe;University Clinical Aptitide Test,2012

3. Widening access to medical education for under-represented socioeconomic groups:Population based cross sectional analysis of UK data, 2002-6;Mathers;BMJ,2011

4. Impact of selection strategies on representation of underserved populations and intention to practise:International findings;Larkins;Med Educ,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3