Clear aligner therapy versus conventional brackets: Oral impacts over time

Author:

Hashemi Sara1,Hashemi Seyed Saman2,Tafti Kioumars Tavakoli1,Khademi Seyed Sobhan3,Ariana Niyosha4,Ghasemi Shohreh5,Dashti Mahmood6,Ghanati Hamed7,Mansourian Marjan89

Affiliation:

1. Dental Students’ Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2. Private Practice, Dental Students’ Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3. Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

4. Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

5. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Dental College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia

6. School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

7. Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

8. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

9. Department of Automatic Control (ESAII), Biomedical Engineering Research Centre, The Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: The objective is to compare the impact of clear aligner treatment (CAT) versus conventional fixed appliance treatment (FAT) on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) among adults at five-time points: pretreatment (T0), 1 week (T1), 1 month after (T2), and 6 months after (T3) treatment initiation, and in the long-term follow-up (T4). Materials and Methods: Search terms were based on Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and non-MeSH. Potentially eligible studies compared OHRQoL in clear aligner (CA) and fixed appliance (FA) patients. In February 2023, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and PubMed were searched for published studies. Nine out of 94 shortlisted papers were eligible for a systematic review. Of these nine papers, five studies were considered for a meta-analysis. Results: At T0, CA and FA patients had similar oral health impact profile (OHIP)-14 questionnaire scores with a standard mean difference (SMD) of 0.105 (confidence interval [CI]:−1.029–1.48).The SMD of the OHRQoL related to T1, T2, and T3 was −3.119 (CI:−0.145, 0.355), −1.527 (CI:−5.597, −0.64), and− 2.331 (CI:−1.906, −1.148).T4 showed no difference between groups (SMD = 0.007, CI: CI:−4.286, −0.376). Regarding the OHIP-14 domains, functional limitations remained consistent in both groups across all time intervals. Psychological discomfort exhibited a notable difference only at T2. Throughout the treatment, CAT showed significantly lower levels of physical, psychological, and social disability, as well as handicap, though these differences did not persist beyond T4. Notably, physical pain was the sole domain that remained elevated in the FAT group up to T4. Conclusion: During the 1st day of the orthodontic treatment, both the CA and FA groups had comparable OHRQoL statuses. However, as time passed, the CA group notably improved their OHRQoL compared to the FA group. Interestingly, after a year or the completion of treatment, both groups eventually reached similar OHRQoL levels. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that FA patients continued to experience more physical pain even a year later.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

General Dentistry

Reference48 articles.

1. An Investigation into Orthodontic Clinical Decision-Making in Antero-Posterior and Transverse Buccal Occlusal Discrepancies;Sharma-Birch;University of Bristol,2021

2. Coordinating the predetermined pattern and tooth positioner with conventional treatment;Kesling;Am J Orthod Oral Surg,1946

3. Patient satisfaction and quality of life changes after Invisalign treatment;Pacheco-Pereira;Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2018

4. Orthodontic treatment with clear aligners and the scientific reality behind their marketing: A literature review;Tamer;Turk J Orthod,2019

5. A comparison of treatment impacts between Invisalign aligner and fixed appliance therapy during the first week of treatment;Miller;Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2007

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3