Analysis of Thrombophilia Test Ordering Practices at King Fahad Hospital of the University

Author:

Aldawood Fatimah Adel12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pathology, King Fahad Hospital of University, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia

2. Laboratory and Blood Bank, Qatif Central Hospital, Ministry of Health, Al Qatif, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND: Thrombophilia tests are widely performed but often in a nonjustified and inappropriate manner as patients are not properly selected, or test timing is not considered. This study aims to assess the current practice of thrombophilia testing at our institution by determining the indications and the testing characteristics to start an initiative toward the reduction of inappropriate testing. METHODOLOGY: This is a retrospective study of patients who have undergone thrombophilia testing at King Fahad Hospital of the University from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. The data were collected from electronic medical records. RESULTS: A total of 545 patients were included (the median age was 38, 76.4% were females). Of the ordered analyzed, 36.59% were for inappropriate indications. Tests were done in the acute phase of thrombosis in 55.21% of patients. However, 18.89% of patients had thrombophilia tests requested during anticoagulants therapy. Positive results were found in 32.66% of patients and were confirmed in 52.24% of patients. The positive diagnostic yield of thrombophilia testing at our institution was only 14.6%. Of the screened tests that required confirmation for definitive diagnosis, 52.23% was obtained. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the improper practice of thrombophilia testing, which calls for initiatives toward reduction in test request by means of educational intervention, posttest guidance by the laboratory, or restraining ordering to the highly specialized clinicians.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

Hematology

Reference17 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3