Bicanalicular silicone intubation versus probing for the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children older than 2 years

Abstract

Background One of the most common conditions presenting to the oculoplastic clinic is congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO), with an incidence of up to 20% in young children. Early probing as early as 18 months of age is usually associated with very good results. Conversely, the results of probing in older children and the need for intubation, either primary or secondary, are debatable in different studies. Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of probing versus primary intubation in children older than 2 years having CNLDO. Patients and methods This prospective cohort comparative study was carried out on 40 eyes of 36 children, aged 2–7 years of both sexes, with epiphora due to CNLDO. The eyes were divided into two groups: group A that included 20 eyes that underwent probing, and group B that included 20 eyes that underwent intubation in whom the tube was removed after 3 months. The enrolled children were subjected to local ophthalmological examination, eye lid examination, puncti evaluation, regurge test, nasal evaluation, lacrimal pathway evaluation, and computed tomography dacryocystography before the procedure and 3 months after the procedure. Results The intubation group (group B) was found to have a higher success rate (90%) compared to the probing group (group A) (80%), although the difference was statistically insignificant (P=0.661). On univariate regression analysis, age, contrast volume, and most dilated portion of the lacrimal sac before the procedure were significant predictors for the success rate (P<0.001). In addition, there was a significant relationship between the success rate and age, most dilated portion, and contrast volume after the procedure (P<0.001). Conclusion There was a high success rate for both probing and intubation in older children above 2 years suffering from CNLDO. Although intubation was found to have a higher success rate, the difference was statistically insignificant.