Bridging the pain gap after cancer surgery – Evaluating the feasibility of transitional pain service to prevent persistent postsurgical pain – A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Thota Raghu S.1ORCID,Ramkiran S2ORCID,Jayant Aveek3ORCID,Kumar Koilada Shiv3ORCID,Wajekar Anjana4ORCID,Iyer Sadasivan5ORCID,Ashwini M6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Palliative Medicine, Tata Memorial Centre (Tata Memorial Hospital), Homi Bhabha National Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

2. Department of Onco-Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Sri Shankara Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

3. Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Vishakapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India

4. Anaesthesiology, Critical Care, Pain, Tata Memorial Centre (ACTREC), Homi Bhabha National Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

5. Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Manipal Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

6. Department of Biostatistics, ICAR-NIVEDI, Ramagondanahalli, Yelahanka, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Abstract

Background and Aims: The lack of a dedicated pain service catering to the postsurgical period has resulted in the origination of the pain–period gap. This has led to a resurgence of transitional pain service (TPS). Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility of TPS in pain practice among postsurgical cancer patients and its prevention of persistent postsurgical pain (PPSP), culminating in chronic pain catastrophising. Methods: The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (ID: CRD42023407190). This systematic review included articles involving all adult cancer patients undergoing cancer-related surgery experiencing pain, involving pharmacological, non-pharmacological and interventional pain modalities after an initial systematic pain assessment by pain care providers across diverse clinical specialities, targeting multimodal integrative pain management. Meta-analysis with meta-regression was conducted to analyse the feasibility of TPS with individual subgroup analysis and its relation to pain-related patient outcomes. Results: Three hundred seventy-four articles were evaluated, of which 14 manuscripts were included in the meta-analysis. The lack of randomised controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of TPS in preventing PPSP and pain catastrophising led to the analysis of its feasibility by meta-regression. The estimate among study variances τ2 was determined and carried out along with multivariate subgroup analysis. A regression coefficient was attained to establish the correlation between the feasibility of TPS and its patient outcome measures and opioid-sparing. Conclusion: TPS interventions carried out by multidisciplinary teams incorporating bio-physical-psychological pain interventions have resulted in its successful implementation with improved pain-related patient outcomes mitigating the occurrence of PPSP.

Publisher

Medknow

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3