Comparative Evaluation of Postoperative Pain in Response to Three Different Endodontic Sealers Using Visual Analog Scale

Author:

Umre Utkarsh Prakash1,Sedani Shweta1,Nikhade Pradnya Prashant2,Bansod Akansha3,Kriplani Simran Uttam3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Crown and Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, DMIHER Deemed University, Wardha, Maharashtra, India

2. Department of Dentistry, Crown and Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, DMIHER Deemed University, Wardha, Maharashtra, India

3. Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, DMIHER Deemed University, Wardha, Maharashtra, India

Abstract

Abstract Background: The present study aimed to evaluate and compare postoperative pain after root canal treatment using three different base endodontic sealers. Materials and Methods: Root canal treatment was initiated in 60 patients diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis, root canal treatment was completed, and different base endodontic sealers were used for obturation were selected based on the random allocation of the participants to the following groups NanoSeal, Dia Proseal, and CeraSeal. Postoperative pain was recorded using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale at 24 h, 48 h, and 7 day after obturation. Statistical analysis was done using the Kruskal–Wallis test and one-way ANOVA. Results: Statistically significant pain reduction was observed in both NanoSeal-S and Dia-Proseal groups post-obturation. In NanoSeal-S, pain peaked after 24 hours (2.25 ± 1.74), decreased at 72 hours (0.5 ± 0.89), and was minimal by day 7 (0.25 ± 0.55). Dia-Proseal exhibited similar trends with peak pain at 24 hours (0.25 ± 0.55), further reduction at 72 hours (0.1 ± 0.31), and negligible pain by day 7 (0.0 ± 0.0). Comparable outcomes were noted with CeraSeal sealer group. Conclusions: CeraSeal showed less postoperative pain compared to Dia-Proseal and NanoSeal-S.

Publisher

Medknow

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3