International Coordinator Survey Results on the Outpatient Management of Patients with the Heartware® Ventricular Assist System

Author:

Schlöglhofer Thomas1,Robson Desiree2,Bancroft Jayne3,Sørensen Gro4,Kaufmann Friedrich5,Sweet Leslie6,Wrightson Neil7

Affiliation:

1. Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Ludwig Boltzmann Cluster for Cardiovascular Research, Vienna - Austria

2. Mechanical Circulatory Support Heart and Lung Transplant Unit, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney - Australia

3. Advanced Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplant Unit, Prince Charles Hospital - Australia

4. Cardiothoracic Department, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo - Norway

5. Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, German Heart Institute, Berlin - Germany

6. HeartWare Inc., Framingham, MA- USA

7. Cardiothoracic Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne - UK

Abstract

Purpose While the HeartWare® Ventricular Assist System (HVAS) is a successful therapy for end-stage heart failure, outpatient management methods can vary significantly and require further investigation. Methods A survey to assess the long-term HVAS patient management and monitoring strategies was completed by 36 international heart centers that currently have over 1,450 patients on VAD support either at home or in the hospital. Multiple choice questions examined VAD program characteristics, anticoagulation management, driveline exit-site dressing and showering recommendations, blood pressure and pump parameter monitoring, and patient discharge protocols. Results Outpatient international normalized ratio (INR) was most frequently measured every 3–4 days (28.6%), and the most frequent schedule for changing driveline exit site dressings was 3 times per week (30.6%). Only 25.7% of centers required their patients to measure blood pressure at home. A subgroup analysis was performed to assess the influence of center experience and larger centers generally had more frequent monitoring compared to smaller centers. Conclusions This survey showed specific differences in outpatient management strategies that were previously unreported. However, further studies with correlations to patient outcomes are necessary to determine optimal patient management recommendations.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Biomedical Engineering,Biomaterials,General Medicine,Medicine (miscellaneous),Bioengineering

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3