Chromogranin a Measurement in Metastatic Well-Differentiated Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: Screening for False Positives and a Prospective Follow-Up Study

Author:

Vezzosi Delphine1,Walter Thomas2,Laplanche Agnès1,Raoul Jean Luc3,Dromain Clarisse1,Ruszniewski Philippe4,d'Herbomez Michèle5,Guigay Joël1,Mitry Emmanuel6,Cadiot Guillaume7,Leboulleux Sophie1,Lombard-Bohas Catherine2,Borson-Chazot Françoise8,Ducreux Michel1,Baudin Eric1,

Affiliation:

1. Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif - France

2. Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Lyon - France

3. Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes - France

4. Pôle des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, Service de Gastroentérologie-Pancréatologie, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy - France

5. Laboratoire de Médecine Nucléaire, Centre de Biologie-Pathologie, CHRU, Lille - France

6. Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie et Oncologie Digestive, Hôpital Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne - France

7. Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Robert Debré, Reims - France

8. Fédération d'Endocrinologie Groupement Hospitalier Est, Bron - France

Abstract

Background Multiple causes of false-positive chromogranin A (CgA) measurement have been reported that may affect its impact as a surrogate marker of RECIST progression in well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (WDGEPNET). Aims 1) To evaluate the frequency of false-positive CgA results. 2) To prospectively compare CgA variations with RECIST morphological changes in patients without known causes of false-positive CgA measurements. Methods First, the conditions responsible for potentially false-positive CgA measurements were screened in 184 consecutive patients with metastatic WDGEPNET. Secondly, a variation in CgA at a 6-month interval was compared to RECIST results at 6 months in 46 patients. Results Among 184 patients, elevated CgA was found in 130 cases (71%) including 99 patients with at least one cause of a false-positive result. Impaired kidney function as well as medication with proton pump inhibitors were found to be the 2 major causes of false-positive results. The sensitivity and specificity of CgA measurements compared with morphological tumor changes according to the RECIST criteria were 71% and 50%, respectively, at 6 months. Conclusion Routine screening for the causes of false-positive CgA measurements is mandatory in WDGEPNET patients. Our study does not validate the use of CgA as a surrogate marker of tumor progression.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cancer Research,Clinical Biochemistry,Oncology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cited by 35 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3