A randomized controlled trial of amitriptyline versus gabapentin for complex regional pain syndrome type I and neuropathic pain in children

Author:

Brown Stephen12,Johnston Bradley1234,Amaria Khush5,Watkins Jessica12,Campbell Fiona12,Pehora Carolyne1,McGrath Patricia6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine , Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto Ontario , Canada

2. University of Toronto, Toronto , Ontario , Canada

3. Child Health Evaluative Services, The Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto , Ontario , Canada

4. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health , University of Toronto, Toronto , Ontario , Canada

5. Department of Psychology , The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto , Ontario , Canada

6. Pain Innovations Inc., London , Ontario , Canada

Abstract

Abstract Background Treatment of neuropathic pain in children is challenging, and requires a multimodal approach of pharmacologic, physical, and psychological therapies; however there is little evidence to guide practice. Amitriptyline and gabapentin are first-line drugs for treating neuropathic pain in adults, yet no studies have examined their efficacy, or compared them directly, to determine which might be better for pain relief and sleep disturbance in children. Methods After informed consent was obtained, 34 patients aged 7–18 years diagnosed with complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I) or a neuropathic pain condition were randomly allocated to receive either amitriptyline or gabapentin. Patients were followed for 6 weeks and assessed for pain intensity, sleep quality and adverse events. We blinded study personnel, including health-care providers, participants, parents, the research coordinator and the data analyst. Patients then completed quantitative sensory testing (QST) and a psychosocial pain assessment with the team psychologist, within 1–3 days of the start of the trial. Results At the end of the 6-week trial, patients on both drugs had important reductions in pain, having surpassed the minimally important difference (MID) of 1. The difference between the groups however was not statistically significant. For the secondary outcomes, we found no statistically significant difference between the two drugs in sleep score or adverse events suggesting that both drugs improve sleep score to a similar degree and are equally safe. Conclusions Amitriptyline and gabapentin significantly decreased pain intensity scores and improved sleep. There were no significant differences between the two drugs in their effects on pain reduction or sleep disability. Implications Although larger, multi-centred trials are needed to confirm our findings, including longterm follow-up, both drugs appear to be safe and effective in treating paediatric patients in the first-line treatment of CRPS I and neuropathic pain over 6-weeks.

Funder

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Clinical Neurology

Reference29 articles.

1. Perquin CW, Hazebroek-Kampschreur AA, Hunfeld JA, Bohnen AM, van Suijlekom-Smit LW, Passchier J, van der Wouden JC. Pain in children and adolescents: a common experience. Pain 2010;87:51–8.

2. Huguet A, Miro J. The severity of chronic pediatric pain: an epidemiological study. J Pain 2008;9:226–36.

3. Treede RD, Jensen TS, Campbell JN, Crucco G, Dostrovsky JO, Griffin JW, Hansson P, Hughes R, Nurmikko T, Serra J. Neuropathic pain: redefinition and a grading system for clinical and research purposes. Neurology 2008;70:1630–5.

4. Bennett G. Neuropathic pain: an overview. In: Borsook D, editor. Molecular neurobiology. Seattle: IASP Press; 1997. p. 109–13.

5. Berde CB, Lebel AA, Olsson G. Neuropathic pain in children. In: Schechter NL, Berde CB, Yaster M, editors. Pain in infants, children, and adolescents. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2003. p. 620–41.

Cited by 53 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3