Why is there no ‘true’ philosophy of linguistics?**A first version of this study appeared, under the same title, in Language & Communication, vol. 11, no. 3, 1991. We wish to thank all those who sent us their critical reactions, and particularly J. Van Brakel, J. Trabant, C. Normand and C. Chauviré. We have tried, in this new version, to take these reactions into account. We also thank R. Harris for his stylistic remarks and suggestions.
Author:
AUROUX SYLVAIN,KOULOUGHLI DJAMEL
Reference38 articles.
1. Language universals. The Chomskyan approach vs. Greenberg's typological approach;Abraham;Belgian Journal of Linguistics,1989
2. La question de l'origine des langues: ordre et raison du rejet institutionnel;Auroux,1988
3. Le rationalisme et l'analyse linguistique;Auroux;Dialogue,1989
4. Catégories de pensée et categories de langue;Benveniste,1958