Policies to reduce CO2 emissions: Fallacies and evidence from the United States and California-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Policies to reduce CO2 emissions: Fallacies and evidence from the United States and California

Published:2019-04 Issue: Volume:94 Page:262-266
ISSN:1462-9011
Container-title:Environmental Science & Policy
language:en
Short-container-title:Environmental Science & Policy

Author:

Tapia Granados José A.,Spash Clive L.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference21 articles.

1. Duality in climate science;Anderson;Nat. Geosci.,2015

2. Carbon Tax & 100% Dividend vs. Tax & Trade: Testimony of James E. Hansen to Committee on Ways and Means, United States House of Representatives, 25 February 2009;Anon,2009

3. Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015;Anon,2015

4. Global Carbon Emissions Hit Record High in 2017, Reuters;Anon,2018

5. Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, 2018. Available from: http://www.eia.doe.gov/.

Cited by 41 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Uncovering the drivers of CO2 emissions in the United States: The hidden spillover effects;Journal of Environmental Management;2024-10

2. Energy Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Panel ARDL Model of Top Five Emitters in Africa;Scientific African;2024-09

3. Carbon Abatement and Leakage in China’s Regional Carbon Emission Trading;Environmental Science & Technology;2024-08-26

4. Impacts of the pilot policy for carbon emissions trading on pollution reduction in China;Journal of Cleaner Production;2024-08

5. The impact of carbon policy news on the national energy industry;Energy Economics;2024-06