Needs and feasibility of living systematic reviews (LSRs): Experience from LSRs on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Needs and feasibility of living systematic reviews (LSRs): Experience from LSRs on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness

Published:2024-05 Issue: Volume:186 Page:86-91
ISSN:1865-9217
Container-title:Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen
language:en
Short-container-title:Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen

Author:

Külper-Schiek Wiebe,Thielemann Iris,Pilic Antonia,Meerpohl Joerg J.,Siemens Waldemar,Vygen-Bonnet Sabine,Koch Judith,Harder Thomas,Piechotta Vanessa

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Reference18 articles.

1. How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis;Shojania;Ann Intern Med,2007

2. Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap;Elliott;PLoS Med,2014

3. From standard systematic reviews to living systematic reviews;Breuer;Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen,2023

4. Guidance for the production and publication of Cochrane living systematic reviews: Cochrane Reviews in living mode;Brooker;Living Evidence Network,2019

5. Feasibility and acceptability of living systematic reviews: results from a mixed-methods evaluation;Millard;Syst Rev,2019

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Leserbrief zu „Needs and feasibility of living systematic reviews (LSRs): Experience from LSRs on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness” (ZEFQ 186 (2024) 86–91) von W. Külper-Schiek et al.;Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen;2024-06