Acceptability of manual versus electric aspiration for first trimester abortion: a randomized trial-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Acceptability of manual versus electric aspiration for first trimester abortion: a randomized trial

Published:2003-03 Issue:3 Volume:67 Page:201-206
ISSN:0010-7824
Container-title:Contraception
language:en
Short-container-title:Contraception

Author:

Dean G.,Cardenas L.,Darney P.,Goldberg A.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynaecology,Reproductive Medicine

Reference16 articles.

1. Alan Guttmacher Institute. Facts in brief: induced abortion. Available at: http://www.agi-usa.org/pubs/fb_induced_abortion.html. Revised 2/2000. Accessed 15 December 2001

2. Update on early medical and surgical abortion;Westfall;J Wom Health,1998

3. Menstrual extraction;Atienza;Am J Obstet Gynecol,1975

4. Manual vacuum aspiration for first-trimester abortion;Westfall;Arch Fam Med,1998

5. Early office termination of pregnancy by soft cannula vacuum aspiration;Meyer;Am J Obstet Gynecol,1983

Cited by 31 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Procedural management of early pregnancy loss in different hospital settings: a cost-consequence analysis for the USA;Journal of Hospital Management and Health Policy;2024-06

2. Termination of Pregnancy;Textbook of Contraception, Sexual and Reproductive Health;2024-01-25

3. Comparison of procedure time between manual and electric vacuum aspiration for pregnancy termination between 10-14 weeks: A randomized trial;Contraception;2022-09

4. Knowledge, attitude and practice towards abortion and post abortion care among Egyptian private obstetricians and gynaecologists;The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care;2020-06-02

5. Termination of pregnancy;Evidence-based Obstetrics and Gynecology;2018-12-21