Judges’ perceptions of expert reports: The effect of neuroscience evidence-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Judges’ perceptions of expert reports: The effect of neuroscience evidence

Published:2018-11 Issue: Volume:61 Page:22-29
ISSN:0160-2527
Container-title:International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
language:en
Short-container-title:International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

Author:

Moulin Valerie,Mouchet Caroline,Pillonel Tessa,Gkotsi G.-M.,Baertschi Bernard,Gasser Jacques,Testé Benoit

Funder

Schweizerische Akademie der Medizinischen Wissenschaften

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Law,Psychiatry and Mental health,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference44 articles.

1. Neuroimaging, culture, and forensic psychiatry;Aggarwal;Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online,2009

2. Functional neuroimaging: Technical, logical, and social perspectives;Aguirre;Hastings Center Report,2014

3. La justice pénale dans les droits canadien et français : étude comparée d'un système accusatoire et d'un système inquisitoire;Beliveau, & Pradel,2007

4. L'enquête et ses méthodes: l'entretien;Blanchet,2007

5. L’expertise judiciaire civile en droit américain. Conférence de consensus sur l’expertise judiciaire civile. Groupe d’analyse de textes;Blumrosen,2007

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Neuroethics and neurolaw in forensic neuropsychiatry: A guide for clinicians;Behavioral Sciences & the Law;2023-11-20

2. Accountability and the Quality of Regulatory Judgment Processes. Experimental Research Offering Both Confirmation and Consolation;Public Performance & Management Review;2022-02-27

3. Forensic-Psychiatric Risk Evaluations: Perspectives of Forensic Psychiatric Experts and Older Incarcerated Persons From Switzerland;Frontiers in Psychiatry;2021-06-14

4. Νeuroscience and Dangerousness Evaluations: The Effect of Neuroscience Evidence on Judges. Findings from a Focus Group Study;Neurolaw;2021