When more isn’t always better: The ambiguity of fully transparent judicial action and unrestricted publication rules-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

登录注册会员服务联系我们

When more isn’t always better: The ambiguity of fully transparent judicial action and unrestricted publication rules

Published:2023-09 Issue: Volume:75 Page:106154
ISSN:0144-8188
Container-title:International Review of Law and Economics
language:en
Short-container-title:International Review of Law and Economics

Author:

Baumann Florian,Fagan Frank^ORCID

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Law,Economics and Econometrics,Finance

Reference26 articles.

1. Supreme court breakfast table;Amar;Slate,2016

2. Attorney voice and the US Supreme Court. Chap 13;Chen,2019

3. Bargaining in the shadow of the law: a testable model of strategic behavior;Cooter;J. Leg. Stud.,1982

4. The philosophy of Certiorari: jurisprudential considerations in Supreme Court case selection;Cordray;Wash. Univ. Law Q.,2004

5. A model of judicial dissent and discretionary review;Daughety;Supreme Court Econ. Rev.,2006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线，采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统，可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容，当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种，收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇，并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询！咨询电话：010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP