Affiliation:
1. Center for Psychology, University of Porto, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences , Porto , Portugal
2. Department of Psychology, Cape Breton University , Sydney , Canada
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Background
The Female Sexual Distress Scale and the Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised—herein called the Sexual Distress Scale (SDS and SDS-R)—are among the most widely used self-report instruments to assess sexual distress, but no version for use in the Portuguese population is available to date.
Aim
The current study aimed to validate the Portuguese version of the SDS/SDS-R in samples of women and men with and without distressing sexual problems.
Methods
A sample of 1,109 participants without distressing sexual problems (761 women) and 382 participants with distressing sexual problems (283 women), ages ranging from 18 to 72 years, were used to examine the psychometric properties of the Portuguese SDS and SDS-R.
Outcomes
Participants completed a survey that included a sociodemographic and health questionnaire, the Portuguese version of the SDS and SDS-R, and measures of sexual satisfaction, sexual quality of life, sexual function, dyadic adjustment, and psychological distress.
Results
Results indicated that the Portuguese SDS and the SDS-R assess 1 general domain of sexual distress and showed good evidences of validity based on content and on relations with other variables. Sexual distress was associated with poorer sexual function, satisfaction, and quality of life, with higher psychological distress, and lower dyadic adjustment. Internal consistency and test-retest (1 month) reliabilities were excellent. Tests of differential functioning of items indicated that the SDS and SDS-R scores can be used to compare women and men on sexual distress, but the SDS/SDS-R scores flagged differential functioning of items and test (DFIT) between participants with and without distressing sexual problems.
Clinical translation
Clinicians and researchers can now make use of the SDS and of the SDS-R in the Portuguese population, facilitating the assessment of sexual distress in clinical settings.
Strengths & Limitations
The Portuguese SDS/SDS-R scores can be compared between women and men, providing information on sexual distress independently of sexual function. With the current evidence, comparisons between individuals with and without distressing sexual problems should be made with caution, as the scores may be biased against the former.
Conclusion
This study provides a validation of the Portuguese version of the SDS/SDS-R that can be used to assess sexual distress in Portuguese women and men and can be used to compare between these 2 groups.
Funder
CPUP
FCT
Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia
Programa Operacional Temático Factores de Competitividade
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Urology,Reproductive Medicine,Endocrinology,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference66 articles.
1. Is good sex good for you? Rethinking sexuality and health;Diamond;Soc Personal Psychol Compass,2012
2. A systematic review of sexual satisfaction;Sánchez-Fuentes M del;Int J Clin Heal Psychol [Internet],2014
3. The conditional importance of sex: Exploring the association between sexual well-being and life satisfaction;Stephenson;J Sex Marital Ther [Internet],2015
4. Psychological and interpersonal dimensions of sexual function and dysfunction;McCabe;J Sex Med,2010
5. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders;American Psychiatric Association,2013
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献