Speaker identification in courtroom contexts – Part I: Individual listeners compared to forensic voice comparison based on automatic-speaker-recognition technology-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Speaker identification in courtroom contexts – Part I: Individual listeners compared to forensic voice comparison based on automatic-speaker-recognition technology

Published:2022-12 Issue: Volume:341 Page:111499
ISSN:0379-0738
Container-title:Forensic Science International
language:en
Short-container-title:Forensic Science International

Author:

Basu Nabanita,Bali Agnes S.,Weber Philip,Rosas-Aguilar Claudia,Edmond Gary,Martire Kristy A.,Morrison Geoffrey Stewart^ORCID

Funder

Research England

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Pathology and Forensic Medicine,Law

Reference52 articles.

1. Unsound law: Issues with (‘expert’) voice comparison evidence;Edmond;Melb. Univ. Law Rev.,2011

2. Assessing the admissibility of a new generation of forensic voice comparison testimony;Morrison;Columbia Sci. Technol. Law Rev.,2017

3. Admissibility of forensic voice comparison testimony in England and Wales;Morrison;Crim. Law Rev.,2018

4. Introduction to forensic voice comparison;Morrison,2019

5. Against jury comparisons;Edmond;Aust. Law J.,2022

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Speaker identification in courtroom contexts – Part III: Groups of collaborating listeners compared to forensic voice comparison based on automatic-speaker-recognition technology;Forensic Science International;2024-07

2. Enhancing speaker identification in criminal investigations through clusterization and rank-based scoring;Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation;2024-07

3. A Novel Convolutional Neural Network Model for Automatic Speaker Identification From Speech Signals;IEEE Access;2024

4. From understanding to justifying: Computational reliabilism for AI-based forensic evidence evaluation;Forensic Science International: Synergy;2024

5. Trial by Cognitive Ordeal: Irrational Approaches to the Opinions of Investigators, Trial Integrity and Proof;The Modern Law Review;2023-10-12