1. Cycling provision separated from motor traffic: A systematic review exploring whether stated preferences vary by gender and age;Aldred;Transport Reviews,2017
2. Alrutz, D., Bohle, W., Müller, H., Prahlow, H., Hacke, U., & Lohmann, G. (2009). Unfallrisiko und Regelakzeptanz von Fahrradfahrern. Bericht zum Forschungsprojekt FE 82.262: Unfallrisiko, Konfliktpotenzial und Akzeptanz der Verkehrsregelungen von Fahrradfahrern [Cyclists‘ crash risk and rule acceptance. Report on research project FE 82.262: Cyclists’ crash risk, conflict potential and rule acceptance] (Berichte der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen V, Verkehrstechnik, Bd. 184). Bremerhaven, Germany: Wirtschaftsverlag NW Verlag für neue Wissenschaft.
3. Alta Planning + Design. (2004). San Francisco’s shared lane pavement markings: Improving bicycle safety (San Francisco Department of Parking & Traffic, edss.). San Francisco, CA, USA. Available at https://nacto.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/San-Franciscos-Shared-Lane-Pavement-Markings-Improving-Bicycle-Safety.pdf.
4. Bicycle-vehicle interactions at mid-sections of mixed traffic streets: Examining passing distance and bicycle comfort perception;Apasnore;Accident Analysis & Prevention,2017
5. How do street attributes affect willingness-to-walk? City-wide pedestrian route choice analysis using big data from Boston and San Francisco;Basu;Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,2022