1. Armstrong, A., 1997. The United Kingdom Network of Experiments on Site/Yield Relationships for Short Rotation Coppice. Forestry Commission Research Information Note 294, Forestry Commission, Edinburgh.
2. Armstrong, A., Johns, C., 1997. Effects of spacing on yield from two clones of poplar and two clones of willow grown as energy coppice. In: Bullard, M.J., Ellis, R.G., Heath, M.C., Knight, J.D., Lainsbury, M.A., Parker, S.R. (Eds.), Aspects of Applied Biology, Biomass and Energy Crops, vol. 49. The Association of Applied Biologists, Warwick, pp. 85–90.
3. Beale, C.V., Heywood, M.J., 1997. Productivity of commercial crops of short rotation coppice at six sites in southern England. In: Bullard, M.J., Ellis, R.G., Heath, M.C., Knight, J.D., Lainsbury, M.A., Parker, S.R. (Eds.), Aspects of Applied Biology, Biomass and Energy Crops, vol. 49. The Association of Applied Biologists, Warwick, pp. 181–188.
4. Coppice systems for short-rotation intensive forestry: the influence of cultural, seasonal and plant factors;Blake;Aust. Forest Res.,1983
5. Blake, T.J., Tschaplinski, T.J., 1992. Water relations. In: Mitchell, C.P., Ford-Robertson, J.B., Hinckley, T., Sennerby-Forsse, L. (Eds.), Ecophysiology of Short Rotation Forest Crops. Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 66–94.