Is bio-energy carbon capture and storage (BECCS) feasible? The contested authority of integrated assessment modeling-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Is bio-energy carbon capture and storage (BECCS) feasible? The contested authority of integrated assessment modeling

Published:2020-02 Issue: Volume:60 Page:101326
ISSN:2214-6296
Container-title:Energy Research & Social Science
language:en
Short-container-title:Energy Research & Social Science

Author:

Low Sean,Schäfer Stefan

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Fuel Technology,Nuclear Energy and Engineering,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Reference51 articles.

1. Politically informed advice for climate action;Geden;Nat. Geosci.,2018

2. Organizing policy-relevant knowledge for climate action: integrated assessment modeling, the IPCC, and the emergence of a collective expertise on socioeconomic emission scenarios;Cointe;Sci. Technol. Stud.,2019

3. Summary for policymakers,2014

4. Summary for policymakers,2018

5. Duality in climate science;Anderson;Nat. Geosci.,2015

Cited by 84 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Modelling beyond growth perspectives for sustainable climate futures: The case for rethinking Shared Socioeconomic Pathways;Energy Research & Social Science;2024-11

2. Making warming worlds: Future making between climate politics and science – The case of the Structured Expert Dialogue;Futures;2024-10

3. How does energy modelling influence policymaking? Insights from low- and middle-income countries;Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews;2024-10

4. Applying the multi-level perspective to climate geoengineering: Sociotechnical bottlenecks for negative emissions and cloud seeding technologies;Energy Research & Social Science;2024-09

5. From planetary scenarios to planetary sensing: Models, observations, and political legibility;The Anthropocene Review;2024-08-25