The ethical assessment of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) in wildlife conservation-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The ethical assessment of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) in wildlife conservation

Published:2024-02 Issue: Volume:290 Page:110423
ISSN:0006-3207
Container-title:Biological Conservation
language:en
Short-container-title:Biological Conservation

Author:

de Mori Barbara,Mercugliano Elena,Biasetti Pierfrancesco,Pollastri Ilaria,Spiriti Maria Michela,Florio Daniela,Andreucci Francesco,Göritz Frank,Holtze Susanne,Galli Cesare,Stejskal Jan,Colleoni Silvia,Lazzari Giovanna,Seet Steven,Zwilling Jan,Ndeereh David,Lekolool Isaac,Ngulu Stephen,Mijele Dominic,Čižmár Daniel,Simone Raffaella,Schrade Lisa,Basile Simone,Hildebrandt Thomas B.

Funder

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference81 articles.

1. All European Academies. 2017. The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised edition. Berlin, Germany: All European Academies. Retrieved from https://www.allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ALLEA-European-Code-of-Conduct-for-Research-Integrity-2017.pdf.

2. “Feelings and fitness” not “feelings or fitness”—the raison d’être of conservation welfare, which aligns conservation and animal welfare objectives;Beausoleil;Front. Vet. Sci.,2018

3. Wildlife welfare;Berg;Front. Vet. Sci.,2020

4. The ethical matrix as a tool for decision-making process in conservation;Biasetti;Front. Environ. Sci.,2021

5. Ethical analysis of the application of assisted reproduction technologies in biodiversity conservation and the case of white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum) ovum pick-up procedures;Biasetti;Front. Vet. Sci.,2022