An investigation of clinical studies suggests those with multiple objectives should have at least 90% power for each endpoint-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

An investigation of clinical studies suggests those with multiple objectives should have at least 90% power for each endpoint

Published:2006-01 Issue:1 Volume:59 Page:1-6
ISSN:0895-4356
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Author:

Borm George F.,Houben Rein M.G.J.,Welsing Paco M.J.,Zielhuis Gerhard A.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Epidemiology

Reference15 articles.

1. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products. Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products. Points to consider on multiplicity issues in clinical trials. London: 2002.

2. Attitudes in clinical trials;Armitage;Stat Med,1998

3. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products. Statistical principles for clinical trials. Note for guidance on statistical principles for clinical trials. London: 1998.

4. Statistical considerations in the intent-to-treat principle;Lachin;Control Clin Trials,2000

5. Study control, violators, inclusion criteria and defining explanatory and pragmatic trials;McMahon;Stat Med,2002

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Clinical Evaluation of Abuse Potential for New Pharmaceuticals;Nonclinical Assessment of Abuse Potential for New Pharmaceuticals;2015

2. A new combined strategy to implement a community occupational therapy intervention: designing a cluster randomized controlled trial;BMC Geriatrics;2011-03-30

3. Sample size determination and statistical power in randomized controlled trials;Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology;2010-05

4. A generalized concept of power helped to choose optimal endpoints in clinical trials;Journal of Clinical Epidemiology;2007-04

5. Human recombinant activated factor VII for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with liver diseases;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews;2007-01-24