1. A. Rajeev, N. K. Meena, and K. Pallav, “Comparative study of seismic design and performance of omrf building using indian, british, and european codes,” Infrastructures, vol. 4, no. 4, 2019, doi: 10.3390/infrastructures4040071.
2. Comparative study of static and dynamic seismic analysis of multistoried RCC buildings by ETAB;Kakpure;Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl.,2017
3. A. J. Satasiya, S. Consultant, and K. S. Consultant, “Comparative Study on is 456 : 2000 and Eurocode 2 : En 1992-1-1 for Analysis and Design of R . C . C . Beam,” Glob. Res. Dev. J. Eng. | Emerg. Res. Innov. Civ. Eng., no. February, pp. 181–185, 2019.
4. T. Izhar, S. Bano, and N. Mumtaz, “Comparative Study on Analysis and Design of Reinforced Concrete Building under Seismic Forces for Different Codal Guidelines,” Int. J. Trend Sci. Res. Dev., vol. Volume-3, no. Issue-4, pp. 536–551, 2019, doi: 10.31142/ijtsrd23819.
5. A. A. Siddiqui, N. N. Harry, Y. Kumar, and P. G. Sstudent, “Design Comparison of Different Reinforced Concrete Member Using Different Country Codes,” vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 325–332, 2021, [Online]. Available: www.jetir.org.