A critical review of the dominant lines of argumentation on the need for strategic environmental assessment-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A critical review of the dominant lines of argumentation on the need for strategic environmental assessment

Published:2007-10 Issue:7 Volume:27 Page:585-606
ISSN:0195-9255
Container-title:Environmental Impact Assessment Review
language:en
Short-container-title:Environmental Impact Assessment Review

Author:

Bina Olivia

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Ecology,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference100 articles.

1. Policy environmental assessment;Bailey,1999

2. The rationality and logic of NEPA revisited;Bartlett,1997

3. The theory of Environmental Impact Assessment: implicit models of policy making;Bartlett;Policy Polit,1999

4. United States;Bass,2005

5. Benson J. (2003) What's the alternative? Impact assessment tools and sustainable planning. Paper presented at the 23rd Meeting of the IAIA, Marrakech 14–20 June 2003.

Cited by 137 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Actors in the spotlight: scrutinising how actors affect strategic environmental assessment towards sustainability in municipal master plans;Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning;2024-09-11

2. Comprehensive framework for analysis of EIA effectiveness: Evidence from Espírito Santo State, Brazil;Environmental Impact Assessment Review;2024-09

3. Aportes para la participación social en la evaluación ambiental estratégica, a partir de la aplicación de un caso en Costa Rica;Cadernos de Geografia;2024-05-15

4. Comprehensive Analysis of Eia Effectiveness: Evidence from Espírito Santo State, Brazil;2024

5. SEA and EIA: uncertain boundaries in Spain;Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal;2023-10-25