Do as you say, say as you do: evidence on gender differences in actual and stated contributions to public goods-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Do as you say, say as you do: evidence on gender differences in actual and stated contributions to public goods

Published:2000-09 Issue:1 Volume:43 Page:127-139
ISSN:0167-2681
Container-title:Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization

Author:

Brown Kelly M.,Taylor Laura O.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Economics and Econometrics

Reference16 articles.

1. A randomized response approach to dichotomous choice contingent valuation;Berrens;American Journal of Agriculture Economics,1997

2. Brown, K.M., 1999. Mode, population, and gender effects in experimental applications of contingent valuation. Ph.D. Thesis. Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.

3. Brown, K.M., Gurmu, S., Taylor, L.O., 1999. Mode and subject pool effects in experimental applications of contingent valuation using hurdle models. Working Paper. Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.

4. Gender effects in laboratory public goods contributions;Brown-Kruse;Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,1993

5. Gender and free riding in a threshold public goods game: experimental evidence;Cadsby;Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,1998

Cited by 52 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The construct validity of attitudes toward sex offenders (ATS) scale: ATS is more strongly linked to the acceptance of sex offenders than other offenders or non‐offenders;Scandinavian Journal of Psychology;2024-05-24

2. Willingness to pay for female-made wine: Evidence from an online experiment;Journal of Wine Economics;2024-02

3. CO2 Emission reduction – Real public good provision by large groups in the laboratory;Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization;2022-08

4. Intention Versus Action: Household Adoption of Best Management Practices for Water Quality;Water Resources Research;2022-06-28

5. Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Conceptualisation of external validity, sources and explanations of bias and effectiveness of mitigation methods;Journal of Choice Modelling;2021-12