Affiliation:
1. Leibniz-Institut DSMZ-Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH, Inhoffenstraße 7B, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany
Abstract
The genus name
Rhodococcus
Zopf 1891 was created to accommodate two species of red pigment (lipochrome)-producing bacteria. However, the genus name Rhodococcus Hansgirg 1884 had already been applied to an algal taxon. The wording of the 1975 and subsequent revisions of the Code dealing with bacteria/prokaryotes is such that the name
Rhodococcus
Zopf 1891 is illegitimate, despite the fact that it was included on the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names. Further research using databases of scientific names of organisms indicate the status of the name
Rhodococcus
Zopf 1891 needs to be carefully considered.
Subject
General Medicine,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Microbiology
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Request for an Opinion: conservation of the illegitimate prokaryotic generic name Proteus Hauser 1885 (Approved Lists 1980);International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology;2024-06-26
2. Judicial Opinion 130;International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology;2024-06-06
3. Is the bacterial genus name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 illegitimate? Request for an Opinion;International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology;2024-01-25
4. Judicial Opinions 103–111;International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology;2022-02-03
5. Comparative Genomics of the Rhodococcus Genus Shows Wide Distribution of Biodegradation Traits;Microorganisms;2020-05-21