Gender‐affirming hysterectomy in the United States: A comparative outcomes analysis and potential implications for uterine transplantation

Author:

Siringo Nicolette V.1,Boczar Daniel1,Berman Zoe P.1,Chaya Bachar F.1,Kimberly Laura12,Rodriguez Colon Ricardo1,Trilles Jorge1,Brydges Hilliard1,Rodriguez Eduardo D.1

Affiliation:

1. Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery New York University Langone Health New York New York USA

2. Division of Medical Ethics, Department of Population Health New York University Langone Health New York New York USA

Abstract

AbstractPurposeHysterectomy is a gynecological procedure sometimes performed as part of the gender‐affirming process for transgender and gender‐expansive patients assigned female at birth. Our goal was to compare surgical outcomes between patients undergoing gender‐affirming hysterectomy and patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign menstrual disorders. We then explored the implications of gender‐affirming hysterectomy for uterine transplantation.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2009 through 2018. We identified patients undergoing hysterectomy in the United States based on Current Procedural Terminology code. We used the International Classification of Diseases 9 or 10 codes to identify patients with benign menstrual disorders (non‐gender‐affirming group) and gender dysphoria (gender‐affirming group). We compared patient characteristics and surgical complications.ResultsOf the 40,742 patients that met inclusion criteria, 526 (1.3%) patients were individuals with gender dysphoria. Compared to patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign menstrual disorders, gender‐affirming patients were younger, were healthier, had a lower prevalence of diabetes, and were more likely to undergo surgery in the outpatient setting, with shorter time to discharge. Complication rates were similar between groups. Logistic regression controlling for the American Society of Anesthesiology classification determined the difference of return to the operating room was not statistically significant (OR 1.082; 95% CI, 0.56–2.10; p = 0.816).ConclusionGender‐affirming hysterectomy has a safety profile similar to hysterectomy performed for benign menstrual disorders. Researchers should further explore the possibility of uterus donation among these patients as they may be suitable candidates.

Publisher

Guttmacher Institute

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Obstetrics and Gynecology,Sociology and Political Science

Reference33 articles.

1. Comparison of the effects of total laparoscopic hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy on sexual function and quality of life;Beyan E;BioMed Research International,2020

2. Types of hysterectomy. Comparison of characteristics, hospital costs, utilization and outcomes;Campbell ES;J Reprod Med,2003

3. Trends in Various Types of Surgery for Hysterectomy and Distribution by Patient Age, Surgeon Age, and Hospital Accreditation: 10-Year Population-Based Study in Taiwan

4. Hysterectomy Rates in the United States, 2003

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3