COVID ‐19, health care, and abortion exceptionalism in the United States-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

COVID ‐19, health care, and abortion exceptionalism in the United States

Published:2021-03 Issue:1-2 Volume:53 Page:5-12
ISSN:1538-6341
Container-title:Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
language:en
Short-container-title:Perspect Sex Reprod Health

Author:

Joffe Carole¹,Schroeder Rosalyn¹

Affiliation:

1. Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH) program in the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences University of California San Francisco California USA

Publisher

Guttmacher Institute

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Obstetrics and Gynecology,Sociology and Political Science

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1363/psrh.12182

Reference25 articles.

1. Abortion exceptionalism and undue burden preemption;Borgmann CE;Wash & Lee Law Rev,2014

2. Casey and the clinic closings: when protecting health obstructs choice;Greenhouse L;Yale Law J,2015

3. Abortion exceptionalism and the mifepristone REMS

4. COVID ‐19 and Independent Abortion Providers: Findings from a Rapid‐Response Survey

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Comparing hospital- vs. non-hospital-affiliated clinic adoption of abortion innovations and cash-pay availability during the COVID-19 pandemic: A secondary analysis of a United States nationwide survey;Contraception;2024-09

2. Abortion, criminal law, and transgression;Women's Studies International Forum;2024-07

3. Experiences of the Irish model of community medical abortion: adherence to self-managed, people-centred abortion care;Irish Political Studies;2024-07

4. Dobbs , Gender Animus, and the Impact on Abortion Providers;Journal of Women, Politics & Policy;2024-01-02

5. Health providers’ reasons for participating in abortion care: A scoping review;Women's Health;2024-01