The Data Evaluation of Interlaboratory Comparisons for Calibration Laboratories

Author:

Velychko Oleh,Gordiyenko Tetyana

Abstract

National accreditation agencies in different countries have set quite strict requirements for accreditation of testing and calibration laboratories. Interlaboratory comparisons (ILCs) are a form of experimental verification of laboratory activities to determine technical competence in a particular activity. Successful results of conducting ILCs for the laboratory are a confirmation of competence in carrying out certain types of measurements by a specific specialist on specific equipment. To obtain reliable results of ILC accredited laboratories, it is necessary to improve the methods of processing these results. These methods are based on various data processing algorithms. Therefore, it is necessary to choose the most optimal method of processing the obtained data, which would allow to obtain reliable results. In addition, it is necessary to take into account the peculiarities of the calibration laboratories (CLs) when evaluating the results of ILС. Such features are related to the need to provide calibration of measuring instruments for testing laboratories. The evaluation results for ILCs for CLs are presented. The results for all participants of ILCs were evaluated using the En and z indexes. The obtained results showed that for the such ILCs it is also necessary to evaluate the data using the z index also.

Publisher

IntechOpen

Reference44 articles.

1. ILAC B7:10/2015. The ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement, ILAC, 2015; 8 p

2. ILAC P4:05/2019. ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement: Policy and Management, ILAC, 2019, 11 p

3. ILAC P5:05/2019 ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement: Scope and Obligations, ILAC; 2019, 9 p

4. Velychko O., Gordiyenko T. Metrological Traceability at Different Measurement Levels. Standards, Methods and Solutions of Metrology, Published by IntechOpen, London, United Kingdom, 2019; Chapter 1, pp. 1–21. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.84853

5. ILAC P9:06/2014 ILAC Policy for Participation in Proficiency Testing Activities, ILAC; 2014, 8 p

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3