Author:
J. Ghaben Suad,Fitri Mat Ludin Arimi
Abstract
This chapter aims to provide guidelines on implementing treatment outcome measures (TOMs) in telemedicine. It outlines the definition and the ICF classification of TOMs and highlights the considerations for integrating TOMs in telemedicine. We identified the STEERING model, which guides toward the development of effective TM systems that have the potential to promote TOMs. Furthermore, the chapter provides a roadmap on how to administer TOMs in telemedicine, with an emphasis on facilitators and barriers to this process. Finally, the chapter provides a schematic representation of selected TM systems with and without hardware and highlights the implemented TOMs in the context of the STEERING model and the three-pronged approach.
Reference76 articles.
1. Stokes EK. Rehabilitation Outcome Measures. 1st ed. Churchill Livingstone; 2011. 190 p
2. Hill K, Denisenko S, Miller K, Clements T, Batchelor F, Morgan P. Clinical Outcome Measurement in Adult Neurological Physiotherapy. 4th ed. Melbourne: Australian Physiotherapy Association, National Neurology Group; 2010. pp. 3-6
3. Liu Y, Avant KC, Aungsuroch Y, Zhang X-Y, Jiang P. Patient outcomes in the field of nursing: A concept analysis. International Journal of Nursing Sciences. 2014;(1):69-74
4. Moyse K, Enderby P, Chadd K, Gadhok K, Bedwell M, Guest P. Outcome measurement in speech and language therapy: A digital journey. BMJ Health & Care Informatics. 2020;(1):1-6
5. Kaplan SL. Outcome Measurement and Management: First Steps for the Practicing Clinician. USA: Philadelphia: F.A.Davis; 2007