Author:
Abelsen Birgit,Fosse Anette
Abstract
This chapter provides insights into team effectiveness in general practice. It is based on a qualitative case study from five purposively recruited Norwegian general practices participating in a pilot for implementing primary healthcare teams. To assess team effectiveness, 41 individual and group interviews were performed in the practices. The data production and the analysis were guided by Hackman’s team effectiveness model. Five overarching themes were identified: teamwork nature, buy-in, macro-team leadership, individual satisfaction, and performance outcome. Despite variation in the organizational context, the informants at four of five of the practices agreed that functional teamwork produced good and relevant results—primarily for the patients, as well as largely for themselves as it increased job satisfaction. The study shows that becoming real and effective micro- or macro-teams involves extensive, targeted, and time-consuming change work. Actual change requires leadership, buy-in, and a significant effort linked to structuring the teamwork. The results raise the question of whether it is a sensible use of resources to scale up and spread primary healthcare teams to all general practices in Norway. Management training as part of specialist training for all general practitioners to acquire the competence to lead effective micro-teams could be beneficial for teamwork development.
Reference45 articles.
1. OECD. Realising the Potential of Primary Health Care. Paris: OECD; 2020
2. Rosen MA, Diaz Granados D, Dietz AS, Benishek LE, Thompson D, Pronovost PJ, et al. Teamwork in healthcare: Key discoveries enabling safer, high-quality care. The American Psychologist. 2018;(4):433-450. DOI: 10.1037/amp0000298
3. WHO. The World Health Report 2008 - Primary Health Care: Now more than Ever. Geneva: WHO; 2008
4. Schmutz JB, Meier LL, Manser T. How effective is teamwork really? The relationship between teamwork and performance in healthcare teams: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2019;(9):e028280. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028280
5. Bonciani M, Schäfer W, Barsanti S, Heinemann S, Groenewegen PP. The benefits of co-location in primary care practices: The perspectives of general practitioners and patients in 34 countries. BMC Health Services Research. 2018;(1):132. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-2913-4