Perspective chapter: Examining the intersecting connections between intersectionality and socioeconomic inequality

Author:

Thulani Bongani Makhanya Monument

Abstract

In today’s society, social inequality is a deeply ingrained issue that affects people on multiple levels of identification. Traditional approaches to resolving inequality, on the other hand, frequently fail to take into consideration the intricate ways in which different identities intersect. “Intersectionality,” highlights race, gender, class, and sexual orientation—interact and influence how a person is privileged or marginalised. This approach offers a crucial perspective for appreciating the multifaceted character of socioeconomic inequality. Gaining a greater knowledge of the specific issues faced by individuals at the intersections of several marginalised groups allows us to better grasp how diverse identities interact. A multifaceted strategy is needed to effectively address the intersectional nature of social injustice. This paper proposes that policymakers should make sure that marginalised communities’ perspectives are heard and are actively involved in the decision-making process. Additionally, it is critical to raise awareness and knowledge of intersectionality among a range of stakeholders, such as the public, educators, and legislators. This paper used secondary sources as its technique, and text content analysis was used to derive pertinent insights from the data that were gathered. This paper has four recommendations directed to policymakers on how socioeconomic inequality could be addressed

Publisher

IntechOpen

Reference54 articles.

1. Anthias F. Intersectional what? Social divisions, intersectionality and levels of analysis. Ethnicities. 2013;(1):3-19. DOI: 10.1177/1468796812463547

2. Yuval-Davis N. Situated intersectionality and social inequality. Raisons Politiques. 2015;:91-100. DOI: 10.3917/rai.058.0091. Available from:

3. Crenshaw K. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum. 1989;:139-167

4. Collins PH. Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology. 2015;:1-20. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142

5. Williams CL, Collins PH. Intersectionality, social identities, and women’s access to resources: A case study of Black and White women in Alabama. Gender and Society. 2001;(1):121-138

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3