Author:
Shrestha Anita,Krishna Shrestha Shyam
Abstract
This study shifts its focus from the predominant biophysical perspective of climate change (CC) to a sociological lens, particularly in the context of the Ramechhap district, Nepal. It delves into the local perceptions of CC and emphasizes its sociological impact on livelihoods. Employing a constructivist theory and the complex human—environment systems, the research extensively explores institutional, structural, and societal pathways of adaptation. The study employs a qualitative data, utilizing purposive sampling and ethnographic methods such as observation, case studies, KIIs, and FGDs. The findings underscore the challenges faced by farmers in the Ramechhap, particularly those dependent on forest, agriculture and livestock, due to the impacts of global warming. Issues such as increased drought, temperature fluctuations, altered monsoons, and other climate-induced changes emerge as disruptive factors affecting the agricultural system, rendering it vulnerable and less productive. To counteract these climate risks, farmers in the Ramechhap employ adaptive measures grounded in traditional and local knowledge concurrently integrating new technologies. Adjustments to crop varieties based on climate disturbances and the establishment of collective networks and social relations through the exchange of experiences are crucial strategies. The research contributes valuable sociological insights into the local dynamics of CC and proposes holistic CC policies.
Reference78 articles.
1. Sarucheraf MM. Smallholder farmers’ understanding of and responses to climate change in Malawi: A case study of Mphunga group village, Salima District [dissertation]. Stellenbosch University, South Africa Sociology and Social Anthropology; 2019
2. Giddens A. Modernity and Self Identity. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1991
3. Liu J, Brulle RJ, Liu M, Liu Y, Song J. Feedbacks from coupled human and natural systems and their implications for ecosystem change: A study of grassland Systems of Inner Mongolia, China. Biological Conservation. 2007;(2):260-270
4. Bernhard. Analyzing meaning-making in network ties—A qualitative approach. Sage Journal. 25 Jul 2018;. DOI: 10.1177/160940691878710
5. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. 4th ed. Saint Paul, MN: Sage Publication Inc.; 2014