Use and usability of custom-made knee-ankle-foot orthoses in polio survivors with knee instability: A cross-sectional survey

Author:

Raijmakers Bart,Berendsen-de Gooijer Roelofine A.,Ploeger Hilde E.,Koopman Fieke S.,Nollet Frans,Brehm Merel-Anne

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the use of custom-made knee-ankle-foot-orthoses in daily life and differences in usability factors of knee-ankle-foot-orthoses between users and discontinued users. Design: Cross-sectional survey study. Subjects: A total of 163 polio survivors provided with a knee-ankle-foot-orthosis at an outpatient clinic of a university hospital. Methods: Use and usability of knee-ankle-foot-orthoses in daily life were assessed with a postal questionnaire. Usability factors were formulated using the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9241-11 standard. Results: A total of 106 respondents (65%) returned the questionnaire. Of these, 98 were eligible for analysis. Seventy-four respondents (76%) reported using their knee-ankle-foot-orthosis. Compared with discontinued users (24%), users experienced more limitations when walking without an orthosis (p = 0.001), were more often experienced with wearing a previous orthosis (p < 0.001) and were more often prescribed with a locked rather than a stance-control knee-ankle-foot-orthosis (p = 0.015). Furthermore, users reported better effectiveness of their knee-ankle-foot-orthosis (p < 0.001), more satisfaction with goals of use and knee-ankle-foot-orthosis-related aspects (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The majority of polio survivors used their custom-made knee-ankle-foot-orthoses in daily life. Factors related to continued use, such as walking ability without orthosis, expectations of the orthosis, previous orthosis experience and type of knee-ankle-foot-orthosis provided, should be considered and discussed when prescribing a knee-ankle-foot-orthosis in polio survivors. 

Publisher

Medical Journals Sweden AB

Subject

Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,General Medicine

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3