Metformin adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes and its association with glycated haemoglobin levels

Author:

Chepulis Lynne,Mayo Christopher,Morison Brittany,Keenan Rawiri,Lao Chunhuan,Paul Ryan,Lawrenson Ross

Abstract

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMetformin is the initial medication of choice for most patients with type 2 diabetes. Non-adherence results in poorer glycaemic control and increased risk of complications. AIMThe aim of this study was to characterise metformin adherence and association with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in a cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODSPrescription and dispensing data were used for this study. Primary care clinical and demographic data were collected from 10 general practices (October 2016–March 2018) and linked to pharmaceutical dispensing information. Metformin adherence was initially measured by calculating the proportion of patients who had optimal medication cover for at least 80% of days (defined as a medication possession ratio (MPR) of ≥0.8), calculated using dispensing data. Prescription adherence was assessed by comparing prescription and dispensing data. The association between non-adherence (MPR <0.8) and HbA1c levels was also assessed. RESULTSOf the 1595 patients with ≥2 metformin prescriptions, the mean MPR was 0.87. Fewer Māori had an MPR ≥0.8 than New Zealand European (63.8% vs. 81.2%). Similarly, Māori received fewer metformin prescriptions (P=0.02), although prescription adherence did not differ by ethnicity. Prescription adherence was lower in younger patients (P=0.002). Mean HbA1c levels were reduced by 4.8 and 5.0mmol/mol, respectively, in all and Māori patients with an MPR ≥0.8. Total prescription adherence reduced HbA1c by 3.2mmol/mol (all P<0.01). DISCUSSIONEthnic disparity exists for metformin prescribing, leading to an overall reduction in metformin coverage for Māori patients. This needs to be explored further, including understanding whether this is a patient preference or health system issue.

Publisher

CSIRO Publishing

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3