Abstract
Context Baits are used to deliver lethal or other substances in wildlife management programs across the globe. Successful baiting campaigns are contingent upon the availability of baits to target animals. Bait density is often increased in an attempt to improve bait encounter probabilities. However, this comes with a concomitant increase in cost and may result in significant bait wastage if deployed in areas of low target species activity. Aims The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness, efficiency and cost of different bait transect methods in intersecting home and core ranges of feral pigs as a case study to determine optimal spacing and placement of baiting transects. Methods The authors simulated a variety of systematically spaced aerial transects, watercourse-aligned aerial transects and ground transects along property boundaries and farm tracks, and compared them with home and core ranges of feral pigs, at two study sites in Queensland, Australia. Transect effectiveness at intersecting pig ranges was determined through beta-regression and estimated marginal means (emmeans); efficiency was considered as emmeans per unit of transect length. Key results The study found that systematically spaced aerial transects at 4 km intervals were the most efficient means of intersecting both home and core ranges of feral pigs. Additionally, no alternate transect method, either aerial or ground, provided significantly greater effectiveness at intersecting feral pig home and core ranges at these study sites. Ground transects along farm tracks and property boundaries were also between 113% and 192% more expensive than aerial transects at 4 km spaced intervals for either fixed-wing or rotary aircraft. Conclusion Systematically spaced aerial transects at 4 km intervals are among the most effective and are the most efficient means of intersecting feral pig ranges at the study sites examined. Implications Our methodology offers a blueprint for both vaccination and toxin baiting programs to assess and compare bait transect placements. More specifically for feral pig control, aerial transects with 4 km systematic spacing provide an effective and efficient means for intersecting feral pig ranges. Furthermore, additional data on bait encounter and interaction probabilities are required to determine transect effectiveness at bait uptake by the target species.
Funder
Queensland Murray Darling Committee
Arrow Energy
Biosecurity Queensland
South East Local Land Services
NSW Environmental Trust
Santos GNLG
Southern Queensland Landscapes
Reference41 articles.
1. Influence of bait type, weather and prey abundance on bait uptake by feral cats () on Peron Peninsula, Western Australia.;Conservation Science Western Australia,2007
2. Effect of presentation on the attractiveness and palatability to wild dogs and other wildlife of 2 unpoisoned wild-dog bait types.;Wildlife Research,1989
3. Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (2021) Permit to allow minor use of a registered agvet chemical product for the control of feral pigs. Permit Number – PER89572. Available at
4. Australian Taxation Office (2023) Expenses for a car you own or lease. Available at [accessed 6 June 2023]
5. Aerial baiting and wild dog mortality in south-eastern Australia.;Wildlife Research,2020