Surgical treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation concomitant to coronary artery bypass grafting: pulmonary vein isolation or maze V?

Abstract

Highlights. Maze V significantly reduces the recurrence of AF compared to bipolar RFA for PVI in the short and mid-term period.Aim. To assess the effectiveness and safety of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in comparison with Maze V for treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) concomitant to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).Methods. Medical records of 139 patients with coronary artery disease and concomitant paroxysmal AF were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 patients (n = 71) underwent CABG + bipolar radiofrequency ablation for PVI, and Group 2 patients (n = 68) underwent Maze V + CABG. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis with a 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching was done. 30 patients were selected from each group. The exclusion criteria were as follows: emergent CABG, concomitant valvular heart disease, non-paroxysmal AF, decompensation of chronic diseases, and cancer. On-pump CABG was performed at normothermia with warm blood hyperkalemia cardioplegia. RFA for PVI and Maze V were performed before CABG under parallel perfusion without aortic cross-clamping. The primary and secondary endpoints included recurrent AF/atrial flutter, sinus rhythm at discharge and in the long-term period, permanent pacemaker implantation, major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events.Results. After the PSM analysis, the CABG+Maze V group and CABG+RFA for PVI differed significantly in the duration of surgery (330 [310; 375] vs. 255 [225; 270] min, p = 0.0001), cardiopulmonary bypass time (131 [113; 144] min vs. 89 [74; 98] min, p = 0.0001), duration of AF treatment (53 [44; 59] min vs. 10 [9; 12] min, p = 0.0001). The structure and rate of complications in both groups were comparable. There were no in-patient deaths. Recurrent AF/atrial flutter significantly reduced in the CABG+Maze V group compared to the CABG+RFA for PVI group (13.3% vs. 33.3%, respectively; p = 0.044). Sinus rhythm was restored in all cases. The rate of transient sinus node dysfunction (no more than 5 days) was 6.7% in the Group 1 and 16.6% in the Group 2. The difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.128). The 12-months cumulative freedom from AF/atrial flutter without antiarrhythmic drug therapy was significantly higher in the CABG+Maze V group compared to the CABG+RFA for PVI group (97% vs. 83.5%, respectively; p = 0.020). The freedom from MACE in both groups was 96.7%.Conclusion. Maze V for treating concomitant paroxysmal AF prolonged the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and the surgery itself, but did not affect the postoperative period, indicating its safety and effectiveness. Maze V procedure concomitant to CABG significantly reduced the recurrence of AF compared to RFA for PVI both in the short- and mid-term period. Thus, it is reasonable to perform Maze V+CABG in patients with paroxysmal AF and a high risk of disease progression.