Affiliation:
1. University of Costa Rica
Abstract
This theoretical paper demonstrates that using utility functions to study intertemporal decisions creates an internal contradiction: nonfulfillment of comparability, which is a condition of constructing utility functions. It shows that Riemann’s rearrangement theorem leads to basket incomparability for infinitely lived agents in discrete time and considers Austrian theory the best replacement for the model that implies this conflict. It suggests also that cardinality cannot fix this problem, since it does not eliminate the likelihood of generating conditionally convergent series unable to represent the rankings of potential consumption streams.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference8 articles.
1. Arrow, Kenneth. 1970. Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company
2. Caldwell, Bruce. 1984. Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century. New York: George Allen and Unwin.
3. Congdon, William, Jeffrey Kling, and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2011. Policy and Choice: Public Finance through the Lens of Behavioral Economics. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
4. Huerta de Soto, Jes s. 2005. Socialismo, c lculo econ mico y funci n empresarial. Madrid: Uni n Editorial.
5. Lowenstein, George, and Drazen Prelec. 1992. “Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an interpretation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, no. 2 (May): 573–97.