Managing Russian agri-food supply chain networks with power

Author:

Belaya Vera12,Hanf Jon Henrich3

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Agricultural and Food Sciences, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, 06099 Halle (Saale), Germany

2. Leibniz-Institute for Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe (IAMO), Theodor-Lieser- Str. 2, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany

3. Department of International Wine Business, Applied University RheinMain, Von-Lade-Straße 1, 65366 Geisenheim, Germany

Abstract

The importance of power is underlined by many scientists who view it as a key behavioural construct. Power distinguishes itself as an effective tool in coordinating and promoting harmonious relationships, solving conflicts, and enhancing performance. An important challenge is to find out what role power plays in managing supply chain networks, paying specific attention to its effects on coordination and cooperation. The aim of our work is to investigate the role of power in supply chain networks in order to work out a strategy that enables supply chain managers to select an effective mix of power mechanisms. We critically examine the existing literature and elaborate on the role of power in supply chain relationships. We work out and test a theoretical model of the effects of power on cooperation and coordination and discuss possible managerial implications of using power as an effective tool for promoting supply chain management. To verify our research hypotheses we conducted semi-structured in-depth expert interviews via telephone about relationships of international food processing companies with their suppliers in Russia and tested the model using the Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach. Depending on the origin of power, it may have different effects on cooperation and coordination. Based on the results of the survey we worked out a special ranking system for the use of power depending on its expected effect on coordination and cooperation. Expert power has the highest ranking among the other types of power for improving coordination. Therefore, we recommend using this strategy as a first priority for improving coordination. The data in our PLS analysis represent only a single perspective in the dyad: food processing companies. Gathering data from other companies' perspectives, such as retailers or agricultural producers, could have produced different (presumably more realistic or complete) findings. Our study offers recommendations for managers about the use of different types of power in managing the Russian agri-food supply chains, with specific attention paid to coordination and cooperation issues. In order to manage supply chain networks successfully, knowledge of different types of power is essential. The developed ranking of different types of power according to their effects on coordination and cooperation is designed to help managers make the right decisions in choosing the appropriate type of power for coordination purposes.

Publisher

Wageningen Academic Publishers

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Computer Science Applications,Management Information Systems

Reference85 articles.

1. Trust, Power and Control in Trans-Organizational Relations

2. The Power of Positive Sanctions

3. Sociodynamics: An Integrative Theorem of Power, Authority, Interfluence and Love

4. A multi‐theoretical perspective on power in managing interorganizational relationships

5. Belaya, V. and J.H. Hanf, 2008. A multi-theoretical approach to defining power. Paper presented at International Conference ‘Power: forms, dynamics and consequences’, 22.24.09.2008 in Tampere (Finland)

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Competitive parity in chain management – factors that influence the long-term compliance with product and quality criteria along the chain;International Food and Agribusiness Management Review;2024-03-26

2. Exploring the use of blockchain-based tokens in the wine industry;International Food and Agribusiness Management Review;2024-03-26

3. Competitive parity as strategic dimension – little to gain, much to lose;International Food and Agribusiness Management Review;2023-11-24

4. The role of power relationships, trust and social networks in shaping milk quality in Kenya;NJAS: Impact in Agricultural and Life Sciences;2023-03-30

5. Too much power or no power: when does intermediary’s power result into better wine and happier farmers?;International Food and Agribusiness Management Review;2022-12-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3