EPISTEMOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE-LEGAL PRINCIPLES IN RESEARCH ON LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES

Author:

Sopilko Iryna1ORCID,Tokarieva Kseniia1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. National Aviation University

Abstract

This research delves into the evolving epistemological foundations of administrative-legal principles within the domain of law enforcement agencies. A meticulous analysis of over 200 scholarly works, with a specific focus on more than ten dissertations, has been conducted to illuminate the essence and content of activities undertaken by law enforcement agencies. The study offers a comprehensive un-derstanding of administrative-legal principles, encompassing their functions, forms, methods of opera-tion, and their legal underpinnings as reflected in sectoral legislative acts. The investigation explores the concept of „administrativelegal principles” and establishes its intricate interrelations with key cate-gories in administrative law, such as „principles of administrative law,” „legal regulation,” and „admin-istrative-legal norms.” Findings reveal that administrative-legal principles form a cohesive system in-fluencing the functions, forms, and methods of operation employed by law enforcement agencies. Key outcomes of the study emphasize the paramount importance of delving into administrative-legal principles within the specific context of law enforcement agencies. A nuanced examination of their functions, forms, and methods of operation underscores their critical role. This research advocates for understanding administrative-legal principles as foundational elements of administrative law, shedding light on their pivotal function in regulating the multifaceted activities of law enforcement agencies.

Publisher

University of Warsaw

Reference29 articles.

1. Basov, A. (2007). Administrative and Legal Regime of the State of Emergency. Kharkiv: Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 19 p.

2. Bokii, O. (2010). Administrative and Legal Regime of Arms Circulation In Ukraine. Kyiv: Kyiv Na-tional University of Internal Affairs, 21 р.

3. Case of Chenchevik V. Ukraine (2019). Retrieved from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-194442

4. Case of Korostylyov V. Ukraine (2019). Retrieved from: f https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/docx/pdf?library=ECHR&id=001-194303&filename=CASE%20OF%20PETROV%20AND%20KOROSTYLYOV%20v%20UKRAINE.pdf&logEvent=False

5. Case of Sokolovskyy V. Ukraine (2019). Retrieved from: https://mvs.gov.ua/upload/document/hkrJNcJZT7iLn2Xij559bgLnC8JzoadOLayddS6h.doc

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3