Author:
PRASAD RAJENDRA,SHIVAY YASHBIR SINGH
Abstract
Data from field experiments conducted at the ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India during the last few years on Zn biofortification of the cereals, viz. wheat (Triticum asestivum L.), rice (Oryza sativa L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) and a grain legume (chickpea) were utilized in studying the comparative efficiency of these crops in grain Zn loading. Although Zn uptake per tonne of grain produced was the highest, the grain Zn loading was the lowest in rice. Zn concentration in grain (an intensity factor) was the highest in wheat at 46.8 mg/kg, closely followed by maize at 45.1 mg/kg, chickpea at 41.8 mg/kg and was the least for rice kernels at 21.2 mg/kg. ZnHI (a capacity factor for measuring grain Zn loading) was also the highest for wheat at 51%, followed by chickpea at 39.3%, maize at 35.9% and was the least for rice at 17.9%. Further, rice grain contains husk (about one-third by weight) and only kernel is consumed, for which ZnHI was only 6.3%; a major part of Zn loaded on grain in rice goes to the husk. Thus, from the Zn nutrition point of view rice is the poorest cereal. However, rice deserves utmost attention, because it is the staple food in South, Southeast and East Asia, where about 62.5% of the world’s people live and hunger and malnutrition is rampant. Since most grain Zn loading in rice is from the Zn absorbed by the roots through xylem in contrast to other crops, where it is mostly achieved through mobilization of Zn in the vegetative tissue through phloem, it is suggested that rice plant types using grain Zn loading through phloem be developed. It is necessary, because applied Zn gets fixed or precipitated in soil through several mechanisms and its availability to rice plants gets reduced as it reaches grain filling stage.
Publisher
Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Directorate of Knowledge Management in Agriculture
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference54 articles.
1. Alloway B J. 2008. Zinc in Soils and Crop Nutrition, 2nd Edn. International Zinc Association, Brussels, Belgium and International Fertilizer Industry Association, Paris, France.
2. Anderson R and Wu Y. 2001. Phosphorus Q-I relationships and agronomic measures of P in surface layers of soil from a long-term slurry experiment. Chemosphere 42(2): 161–70.
3. Black R E, Allen L H, Bhutta Z A, Caulfield L E, de Onis M, Ezzati M, Mathers C and Riviera J. 2008. Maternal and child health consequences. The Lancet 371: 243–60.
4. Bostick B C, Hansel C M, La Force M J and Fendorf S. 2001. Seasonal fluctuations in zinc speciation within a contaminated wetland. Environmental Science and Technology 35: 3823–29.
5. Bouis H E, Hotz C, McClafferty B, Meenakshi L V and Pfeiffer W H. 2011. Biofortification: a new tool to reduce micronutrient malnutrition. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 32: S31–40.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献