Abstract
Present study explored the effect of different floor on hoof health and leg injuries of crossbred dairy cow. Animals (n=24), were randomly assigned into four groups with different floor combination in covered and open area, viz. T0 (concrete and brick paved), T1 (concrete and sand), T2 (rubber mat and sand) and T3 (rubber mat and brick paved). Hoof and limb lesion scores were recorded as per the standard protocol during study period. White line lesion score did not differ significantly, however, sole lesion score and inter-digital space lesion score differed significantly between the groups. Both, sole and interdigital space lesion scores were greater in T0 group. Total hoof lesion score was different between the groups with highest value in T0 group. Month wise hoof lesion scores differedsignificantly in 5th and 6th month between treatments. Decreasing trend was noticed in T1 and T2 from 5th month onwards. In contrast, T0 showed increase in hoof lesion score. Knee lesion score and hock lesion score were different between treatments. Higher scores were found in cows housed in T0 group, while lower scores were noted in T1 group. Knee lesion score decreased in T1 and T2 groups 4th month onwards, however no change was seen in T0 and T3 group. Similar trend was also seen for hock lesion score. In conclusion, provision of sand bed floor in open area of loose house with or without rubber mat floor in covered area was found superior for improving animal welfare in terms of lesser hoof and limb injuries.
Publisher
Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Directorate of Knowledge Management in Agriculture
Subject
General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference36 articles.
1. Andreasen S N and Forkman B. 2012. The welfare of dairy cows is improved in relation to cleanliness and integument alterations on the hocks and lameness when sand is used as stall surface. Journal of Dairy Science 95: 4961–67.
2. Aubé L, Mialon M M, Mollaret E, Mounier L, Veissier I A and de Boyer des Roches. 2022. Review: Assessment of dairy cow welfare at pasture: Measures available, gaps to address, and pathways to development of ad-hoc protocols. Animal 16(8): 100597 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2022.100597.
3. Barberg A E, Endres M I, Salfer J A and Reneau J K. 2007. Performance and welfare of dairy cows in an alternative housing system in Minnesota. Journal of Dairy Science 90:1575–83.
4. Bicalho R C and Oikonomou G. 2013. Control and prevention of lameness associated with claw lesions in dairy cows. Livestock Science 156: 96–105.
5. Boyle L, Mee J, O’Donovan M and Kiernan P. 2005. Welfare and health of dairy cattle on outwintering pads or in cubicle housing with or without cushioned flooring. Project report. RMIS No. 5139 Teagasc, Dairy Production Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork (www.teagasc.ie/research/ reports/dairyproduction/5139/eopr-5139.asp.)