Evaluation of Blood Product Requests in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Observational Study

Author:

Özdamar Yasemin1ORCID,Demir Mehmet Cihat2ORCID,Ağaçkıran İlter3ORCID,Metin Aksu Nalan4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Manisa Şehir Hastanesi

2. DÜZCE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ

3. HİTİT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ

4. HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ

Abstract

Objective: Emergency department (ED) blood product requests are rising, but it is unclear if they are excessive. We aimed to examine the blood product requests and usage rates made by emergency physicians to determine whether the requests for blood products are excessive. Material and Method: This prospective, observational, and single-center study analyzed demographic data indications for blood transfusion, and transfusion rates of patients aged 18 years and older admitted to a tertiary adult emergency department in five months. Results: One thousand four hundred seventy-five blood product requests (with a mean of 6.92 units per patient) were examined. Of 63.1%, these requests were not used. The transfusion rates were 40.89 % for erythrocyte suspension, 25.61% for thrombocyte suspension, and 44.34% for fresh frozen plasma. The main indications for requesting blood products were gastrointestinal bleeding and anemia. Specifically, 30.04% of erythrocyte suspensions, 31.9% of thrombocyte suspensions, and 60.56% of fresh frozen plasma were used for patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. In trauma patients, 12.75% of requested erythrocyte suspensions, 0.083% of thrombocyte suspensions, and 13.89% of fresh frozen plasma were utilized. Conclusion: Excessive requests for blood products in the emergency department can misuse resources. The transfusion committee should develop specialized strategies and increase physician awareness to reduce unnecessary requests and optimize resource utilization.

Funder

None

Publisher

Hitit University

Reference24 articles.

1. Díaz MQ, Borobia AM, García Erce JA, et al. Appropriate use of red blood cell transfusion in emergency departments: a study in five emergency departments. Blood Transfus 2017;15(3):199-206.

2. World Health Assembly. Availability, safety and quality of blood products: report by the Secretariat. World Health Organization. 2010. Available from: URL: https://apps.who. int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA63/A63_20-en.pdf.

3. Chow EY. The impact of the type and screen test policy on hospital transfusion practice. Hong Kong Med J 1999;5(3):275-279.

4. Thabah R, Sailo L, Bardoloi J, et al. ‘Maximum Surgical Blood Order Schedule’in a newly set-up tertiary care hospital. Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care 2019:28-32.

5. Blatchford O, Murray WR, Blatchford M. A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Lancet 2000;356(9238):1318-1321.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3