Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of Common Clinical Standing Balance Tests for People With Hip Osteoarthritis

Author:

Choi Yik Ming1,Dobson Fiona2,Martin Joel3,Bennell Kim L.4,Hinman Rana S.5

Affiliation:

1. Y.M. Choi, DClinPhysio, Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia, and Department of Rehabilitative Services, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.

2. F. Dobson, PhD, Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne.

3. J. Martin, BAppSc, Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne.

4. K.L. Bennell, PhD, Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne.

5. R.S. Hinman, PhD, Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Alan Gilbert Building, 161 Barry St, Carlton, Victoria, 3053, Australia.

Abstract

Background Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is a common musculoskeletal condition affecting older individuals. Clinical balance tests are frequently used to assess standing balance in these people. There is insufficient information regarding the reliability of these tests. Objective The aim of this study was to estimate reliability and measurement error of 4 common clinical standing balance tests in people with hip OA. Design A prospective study was conducted with repeated measures between 2 independent raters within 1 session and within 1 rater over a 1-week interval. Methods Thirty people with hip OA were evaluated. Reliability was estimated for the Four-Square Step Test, Step Test, Functional Reach Test, and Timed Single-Leg Stance Test using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC [2,1]). Measurement error was expressed as standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change. Results The Four-Square Step Test, Step Test, and Timed Single-Leg Stance Test were sufficiently reliable between raters (ICC=.85–.94, lower 1-sided 95% confidence interval [95% CI]=.71–.89), whereas the Step Test (standing on study limb) and Timed Single-Leg Stance Test (standing on nonstudy limb) were sufficiently reliable within a rater over a 1-week interval (ICC=.91, lower 1-sided 95% CI=.80–.83). The Step Test (standing on study limb) and Timed Single-Leg Stance Test (standing on nonstudy limb) achieved optimal levels of reliability (ICC >.90, lower 1-sided 95% CI >.70), with acceptable measurement error (<10%) for clinical outcome measures. The Functional Reach Test was not sufficiently reliable. A ceiling effect was detected for the Timed Single-Leg Stance Test. Limitations Reliability was assessed only between 2 raters during a single session and within 1 rater over a 1-week interval, which limits generalizability. Conclusions The Step Test (standing on study limb) is recommended as a highly reliable test with acceptable measurement error for assessing standing balance in people with hip OA.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3